CLUG meeting: epic fail!

[Wawrzyniec =?unknown-8bit?Q?Niewodnicza=F1ski?=]

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:27:28PM +0000, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> >Fine by me - should we do this democractically?
[...] 
Rather no too much. In Democracy you need quorum, procedure etc. and
groups like LUGs are not good in such things. 

In informal groups like LUG there are need for Leader people Leading 
rather than Rules who Rule a community. 

Nobody oppose my suggestion so there are no reason to bother about
procedure too much.


> I'm only listed there with lug.org.uk because someone ought to be. Does 
> it really say leader? It ought to say contact. I do lurk on lug.org.uk 
> mailing lists just to be sure nothing really important crops up that we 
> ought to know about. You can tell from how often I post that this is a 
> rare occurance!
> 
Great news. I think that we should split duties related to CamLUG to
small pieces and create the council rather than put everything onto arms of
one man.


> Is anyone else lurking on the lug.org.uk mailing lists?

Oh, good idea. I'm going to join the list.

[...]
> Sunday meets and venue are great if you can make it, but weekday 
> evenings do seem more justifiable to family.
>
Indeed.
 
> Also considering timing, it would be a great idea to try to avoid 
> clashing with related local groups. Recently I've begun to go to other 
[...]

I think that Thursday might be a good week day. Not a Friday but close.
 
> Writing this email is giving me a number of other ideas around CLUG. 
> These are in the areas of meetings, website, marketing, and group 
> history/philosophy/identity. I'll stop rambling, develop those some more 
> and post a bit more in the very near future :)
>
There was a project present August last year.

-- 
 Wawrzyniec Niewodniczañski      vel Wawrzek, Larry or LarryN
    Linux User #177124              E-MAIL: wawrzek at gmail.com
 PhD in Quantum Chemistry            WWW: http://wawrzek.name
 MSc in Molecular Engineering           JID: larryn at chrome.pl