[Fwd: Re: CLUG Website]

[Sam Kuper]

2009/12/2 Paul <paul+clug at mansfield.co.uk <paul%2Bclug at mansfield.co.uk>>

> I'm going to play devil's advocate here, to try and provoke people out
> of their apathy!
>
> I think the clug website should be replaced with a static page simply
> referencing the mailing list, and a set of links to member's home
> pages/blogs called maybe "planet clug". the links should be removed if
> the references website doesn't get updated for, say, 6 months?
>

A bit like this <http://clug.sampablokuper.com>? In my experience,
spam-protected wikis stay static pretty reliably in the absence of active
users. The benefit of a wiki, of course, is that if there *are* any active,
constructive users, they can just update the pages instead of having to
email the list for months trying to work out who has the keys to the server.

Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.infowares.com/archive/clug/attachments/20091202/45613387/attachment-0003.htm